No. 21-6680
Jemaine Monteil Cannon v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure direct-appeal final-conviction jurisdiction jurisdictional-claim mcgirt-retroactivity post-conviction postconviction-proceeding retroactivity right-to-counsel state-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma applies retroactively to final convictions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 1408. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was announced. 2. Can a state provide conflicted direct-appeal counsel and then bar a Petitioner from raising a jurisdictional claim for the first time in postconviction proceedings after a petitioner’s conviction becomes final? i
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-28
Reply of petitioner Jemaine M. Cannon filed.
2022-01-18
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2021-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2022)
Attorneys
Jemaine M. Cannon
Emma Victoria Rolls — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Emma Victoria Rolls — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent