No. 21-6689
Daniel Lawrence McGarry v. California
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure preliminary-hearing probable-cause sixth-amendment speedy-trial state-criminal-proceeding
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial attaches to a preliminary hearing in a state criminal proceeding
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED: In June and July of 2015, while out on bail prior to trial, Petitioner Daniel Lawrence McGarry attended his preliminary hearing on a felony assault charge in the State of California. The presiding Magistrate stated that the court’s duty was: “to find whether or not there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed” (
Docket Entries
2022-07-14
Case considered closed.
2022-02-22
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 15, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2022)
Attorneys
Daniel L. McGarry
Daniel Lawrence McGarry — Petitioner