No. 21-6699

J. T. v. Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2021-12-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: best-interests-of-child child-welfare due-process family-law family-separation mental-health mental-stability parental-rights standing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why the Court of Appeal did not consider the fact that I have been mentally stable for more than 3 years and am dedicated to maintain this status?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Why the Court of Appeal did not considerate the fact that | have been mentally stable for more than 3 years and am dedicated to maintain this status? Is the Department of Child Welfare Service through the social workers did not reported the real interactions and relationship that exist between my daughter Joyce and | because they wanted to get my parental rights terminated? Can separation of the child from their origin root meaning biological family can be devastated especially for the child where in near future wants to know exactly where he or she is coming from?

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent J.T. to respond filed.
2022-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services to respond filed.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2022)

Attorneys

J.T.
Amy L. PetkovsekMaryland Legal Aid, Respondent
Amy L. PetkovsekMaryland Legal Aid, Respondent
Julienne Tchoua — Petitioner
Julienne Tchoua — Petitioner
Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services
Julia Doyle Bernhardt — Respondent
Julia Doyle Bernhardt — Respondent