No. 21-6703
Joshua Cumberland v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court fifth-circuit habeas-corpus statutory-provisions timeliness
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit properly denied petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED (1) Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit properly denied petitioner’s Motion for Certificate of Appealability (“COA”) as to his Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. i
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-21
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2021-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Darrel Vannoy
Matthew Caplan — District Attorney, 22nd Judicial District, Respondent
Matthew Caplan — District Attorney, 22nd Judicial District, Respondent
Joshua Cumberland
Claiborne Wood Brown — Claiborne W. Brown, LLC, Petitioner
Claiborne Wood Brown — Claiborne W. Brown, LLC, Petitioner