Should this court reconsider its decision in Gonzales and determine that Congress cannot regulate solely intrastate marijuana distribution due to the massively changed landscape regarding marijuana legality as opined in Justice Thomas' concurrence in Standing Akimbo?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED SHOULD THIS COURT RECONSIDER ITS DECISION IN GONZALES AND DETERMINE THAT CONGRESS CANNOT REGULATE SOLELY INTRASTATE MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION DUE TO THE MASSIVELY CHANGED LANDSCAPE REGARDING MARIJUANA LEGALITY AS OPINED IN JUSTICE THOMAS’ CONCURRENCE IN STANDING AKIMBO? WHERE THE DEFENDANT IS SELLING MARIJUANA ONLY TO MEDICAL MARIJUANA PATIENTS IN A STATE WHERE MEDICAL MARIJUANA IS LEGAL; HAS THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE SO CHANGED THAT A NAKED RELIANCE ON THE GUIDELINES IS OBJECTIVELY UNREASONABLE? SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT BEEN BARRED FROM SUMMARIZING THE DATA FROM THE BUD TENDER SHEETS IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE JURY WAS GIVEN DETAILS AS TO AMOUNTS AND DOLLARS BY SOMEONE WHO HAD NO FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE REGARDING THE FORMS THAT SHE WAS REVIEWING? i