Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Controlled Substances Act preempt an order under a state workers' compensation law requiring an employer to reimburse an injured employee for the cost of medical marijuana used to treat a work-related injury?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Controlled Substances Act preempt an order under a state workers’ compensation law requiring an employer to reimburse an injured employee for the cost of medical marijuana used to treat a work-related injury? ii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES e Minnesota Supreme Court: Musta v. Mendota Heights Dental Center, No. A201551. e Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals: Musta v. Mendota Heights Dental Center, No. WC19-6330. e Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings: Musta v. Mendota Heights Dental Center, No. 7750318-MR-2327
2022-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-31
Supplemental brief of petitioner Susan K. Musta filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-22
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2022-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-02-01
Reply of petitioner Susan K. Musta filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-14
Brief of respondents Mendota Heights Dental Center, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-12-06
Brief amici curiae of Empire State NORML, et al. filed.
2021-11-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 14, 2022.
2021-11-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 6, 2021 to January 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)