No. 21-6766

Alan Eugene DeAtley v. Colorado

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2022-01-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-process due-process enrollment federal-law jurisdiction state-law tribal-businesses tribal-court-jurisdiction tribal-land tribal-law tribal-matters tribal-membership
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the tribal court has jurisdiction over all tribal land, tribal businesses, and all tribal matters without question

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ° Tribal Land Test, Ljed (2) Case5, 69€ 2ob66and one > 008 both gre sh Il in protess Subject a terLaried har” all Tibal a ; OC Dew . , Oo : Febal docaneg or Lean wgerS QLPCASTEIS documents used Shen Aappresel tas “ 7 OME, all as arclered & sheoaleted Se heey. 4. & Sack tesobe Si~ 4 O. Che Sto fe“ Coton og Sie Ae, A. ExAA G8) Plas ola ferag Bestraonis oF Derm: Land Perr mp rey ae Ex 181 (3) ring Bier Stolden 2/120 7reb / mea (02D 7 Ogea t bra hen, AC Suthers $0979 a t/ Ass03lant pdlernedg Cenere. A oe y < we eS, Mesokey, 2 eyrro lds and (n these brets 4s yout wy t/ obi (19 (0 ese plate dd ae O FEcce, Stealing Trebat documenls Maha EX-K anscacr Briel far AE °tibal burkh pas “chy tna of. all Sfidalabe ? %e! Trebsal, Sby ectnte tor Lesed OVer EX-/57V Aad AL/ alt OLSEN 20 of heres iclte ry / Ure o~ S36 Y Land, the StateaF Cals aaa ‘Hveaunrwntl trsno Tee bal [St a5 U5. Supree vo mast exhale al) ree a / preme pegeuires and hele : CE) cd (ES oud no bk State Coark, lolorade Yrotrick bn LF 4a Federal Rioherd davis aud David Zamzew ¢@5¢.no Zolo @ ‘ conte U. Clam Mellie adotameA Ls Utwla bing Tichellsucks Orders Q iy (030g (5 stg Stolden / Ldith intent . We learly Noting 4X Lo oF bee a lab. Gonele l{6/) aput ey eS ds ccentenh ; e Please. order TVA Lihe State 6F Co /aragqo wig eZ Ex paush all tribal Lous fs CEH caorthy (EE, G56 al! Fev bal rales fhak are with ‘ 7 ; F out og hject lon or Ghallenge © pr Passed tre trine beame. to Cppeal are all in Fall ferec., a/26 Fe Vislate Tei ba/ Lae) eth tatent (8 +0 Su Ker Tribal AN nnd Tribal Coects AAT Tr ba | PTCSOS 4 Please pale ThA The Lalgenz Rea tier Tivbal Court Aas Tan " Sab ject ma He fer sdieter 6 yUer~all rd (alors ok these Tribal Courts orders a5 stipulated to by Ab. 6 € Oo lorads has, in cludleg the Com ple Jari¢g diction over fhe Gimesoa Ltt EF ok Leary Nlges Giles aud all ThA Sebjech mM abler~ DooumentS all Stalder Leon [rbd Land’sa (watt cul Tribal Court orders. The Com ple beSert UM) avera ll Shelder peo pevty pales AIAG P®SPOOS OO POSS © PTF bal cecum Dloase order thal Te hal Destraining Order GF = pn place gupare lich and he Tan aecHOons Gre ordered are (0 flee gid Ba veleh ae F please. (6gue the Came wrtederal haw 7° they well Slap: t ee aka Questions Tresended andall ready desiddand (Zrrre fanec f LOE ps A Id parks es rn vole) 1, Teiballoart pas all Jacisdietisp over all Tribal Lang, Tribal buses all teebal matlers with oat gues hor. (iba/Lau! Yes, Federal tau! Yes 2. Tribal loart has all Sursiichis py Over Fecbal ain lant ecnival Gers on trbal Lands anc aQgash Tacbel inex hes ALL Sebel Cour PS Orders even otf Shel Land were Stipulated ca dagreed by Shales Wreludeg Cofarede.{ Tribe (bao! NES Sees / La wi Yes.) 3. Te bal Courkh started (2) 0ases,5ON€ Z90e aa Tone 2008 bofhare shil/ cia) Pveees S we tly A2hs hECng coor: bed tiith ty Aind es (th Ln ve $fagaHtery badtomnr red, the Tribal Court bras the SuctsdeeHon suera tl matter on Trthal Laads aad were Tirbalmewrnbers have been wrong kilg {17 thal law Yes Cegergllaw Yes and fe) ¥, there "Te be | Coerb bas “Lyrisde< bee encl Seebsec! Tce He ditt SUA) all on Same Facts with Ship dlarons aa d Agree tents es tt, rhe ' State of Colorada"Aceep Jig, calor cig 22 Bppmeranree ANT NEUE 0 Bec lhing Sp thallengcng ha Tebal boact orders, = Slalectl Clerads Wrarel exhasl all Tribal remadits {he bore Biot 25 Jo Fecleca (teat Not Bhate Court, Gou at Colored c,d Cl need thes beth Mhegal le cniestagled Hhegally tndieled, (egal Tied, egally sev Maced Kiddnaota ai legal) evcth intent: (7Fibe/ Lacs Mes, ,£ fea! A“ Yes Ee ie! &, States and County; sebdwisins'GEhk authartty Fey 0 Seed Ue a Criminal o Llew ses QOes lg (77 Later Ceuanlty (77ehal LackYes Fecleral tas) (yes ) Stale law (Yes | 6b. Gnti-Lry ene kebn Bebe tel ilige F402 Leer fia A (lacs foe / ma in ee Veo Liyga lar OF VEEAE that pre VIOUSY AS (OFE CF. nf ta G2 GEISER ey Bourke rx Ze USCA rare /Law Ves\ledeva/law 3 Yes.) Sfale Law Ves) TZ QatrTnypun Eber Mek did net bare b

Docket Entries

2022-05-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-03-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2021-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)

Attorneys

Alan E. DeAtley
Alan DeAtley — Petitioner