No. 21-6771
Charles Reddicks v. Massachusetts
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-records equal-protection fourteenth-amendment impartial-jury jury-selection race-neutral racial-discrimination sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-02-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether permitting the Government to run criminal records for potential jurors, then use the records of the record check to strike jurors of color, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the right to an impartial jury under the Sixth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether permitting the Government to run criminal records for potential jurors, then use the records of the record check to strike jurors of color, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the right to an impartial jury under the Sixth Amendment. |
Docket Entries
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Massachusetts to respond filed.
2021-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Charles Reddicks
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Anna E. Lumelsky — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Anna E. Lumelsky — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent