No. 21-6778
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights court-discretion due-process equal-protection exceptional-circumstances extraordinary-relief legal-remedy qualified-immunity standing writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-02-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-01-21
Waiver of right of respondents The State of Minnesota, the State of Minnesota Fourth Judicial District, The Minnesota Appellate Court and Supreme Court, Susan Lee Segal, Grant Barry Anderson, Marie Jacqueline Regis, Kristin A. Siegesmund to respond filed.
2021-12-23
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Mark Thomas Garrett
Mark Thomas Garrett — Petitioner
The State of Minnesota, the State of Minnesota Fourth Judicial District, The Minnesota Appellate Court and Supreme Court, Susan Lee Segal, Grant Barry Anderson, Marie Jacqueline Regis, Kristin A. Siegesmund