Is-certiorari-appropriate-where-Michigan-state-courts-refused-to-address-petitioner's-denial-of-his-constitutional-right-to-counsel

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. IS CERTIORARI APPROPRIATE WHERE MICHIGAN STATE COURTS ; REFUSED TO ADDRESS PETITIONER'S DENIAL OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL AT A CRITICAL STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM IN VIOLATION OF HIS USS. CONST. AM.’S IV AND XIV? : Il. IS CERTIORARI APPROPRIATE WHERE MICHIGAN STATE COURTS REFUSED TO ADDRESS PETITIONERS DENIAL OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE AND DISCOVER THAT ; PETITIONER WAS NOT REPRESENTED FOR A 3-MONTH PERIOD AND THAT NO SERVICE OF THE INFORMATION WAS PERFORMED? ‘III. IS CERTIORARI APPROPRIATE WHERE MICHIGAN STATE COURTS REFUSED TO ADDRESS PETITIONER’S . DENIAL OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL THE EFFECTIVE ; ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ON HIS APPEAL WHEN COUNSEL _ NEGLECTED STRONG AND CRITICAL ISSUES WHICH MUST BE SEEN AS SIGNIFICANT AND OBVIOUS, AND BECAUSE OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO RAISE . : THE WITHIN ISSUES, SHOULD ANY PROCEDURAL DEFAULTS BE OVERCOME? i .