No. 21-6790

Timothy Ryan v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction child-pornography civil-rights constitutional-violations discretionary-review due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in denying Ryan's § 2255 habeas corpus petition without holding an evidentiary hearing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUES TIOVS §=PRESEWTED 1. O1 SEVEN CiRCY | re) G, OU TRCT. OF INDIAVA~ SoutH REVD Division Ox tect Count) ERR woso Vv T on In OENYIMG R ( 2255 H, , ConPus PETITION WITHOUT HolDIWle AN EVIDENT/ARY HEARING 2 IL Bin He piste Conk Fae Awp fon ABuSE ITS OISC@ETIONM IM rtivi A Lota PAE. Limit QULE “To PUROSEFULLY NOT REVIEW OR consi0GR RYAN'S MEMopAwoum IW SuPPoRT OF $2255 HABEAS = Coneus PETITION, AFFIDAVIT, AVO NEw EVIDEME SUBMITTED TO Ex(A NO “THE NEcoep 2 , Hl, O10 THE OistaicT Cove ar And/or ABLUDSI ‘S$ DMC RETION NV MSAPPLYINL“THE RULES FoR ANALYSIS DICTATED f THICK LA WwW TOM, 4bb U.S, bled, 104 Sch 2052, 89 LF). 2 47 (1934) Awd wot ConSiNF Uwe THE OVE? FPoRTY EyAMPLESs nn __IN, 0ip THE pisteuct Court £22 AMO/OL. ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN STATINIe THat EVIDENCE “THAT WAS wot PRESEWTED TO ___4 SULY WAS NOT W FEUIDEN 2? NV, DIO “THE SEvewTH Gecurt Cont of Aggears (AMELLATE Court) ERR ANO fot. Agus ITS DISCRETION IN STATIN THAT M7 “DID vot See“ “THE RQLATENT Covtit UTIOWAL VIOLATIONS oF THE P : QD _ Fount Gen TH AMENDMENTS BY THE Dist@icT Cover Avo 1D A A CEQKECATE OF APPEALABILITY 2 Vi. SHOULD “THE ni Q R LLOWEp "te COWTINUE © DISRE-ALO AND DECINE Con TRARY “Vo Bind ( OFarrs’ DISREGARD NEW OFA ANO SURSTANTIAL LELA AIMS * MISREPRESED _ FACTS IN LEGAL DotuMENTS HARRORING A FALSE MARRATIVE 2 EALTS' AnO FURTHER ENWPoRCE A AAISCARTIADE OF Systice % Vil, SHOULD AcgTUAL IMitlo CENCE CLAIM AFFECT CounT Review 3 fi IE ee . * a List oF paatie s eee ALL PARTIES APPEAQ Al THE C4PtIan OF THe CASE Oy THE COVER PACE a a ee ee a a RR a I ee ee ee RRR a I a I a a an a a a a a I a nn TAME OF ConTEwTSs __opions BELow fe a JORIS DICTION Z COUSTITUTIOVAL Anup STATUTORY PRovisions INVOLVED 3 a nr Con CL AIO | NOL X O APPEADICE ___AQEADLA_ Al APPELLATE CounT DEMIAL OF Caer iFicaTe OF AVPR4L ABleIT er AOEmpik B: DISTRICT CART DENIAL OF $22SS" Motion “To VACATE ___ADEWDIX C$ APPELLATE CoRT DEWIAL OF petition Por. ARMs: AME uDIY 03 DISTRICT CovRT DEMAL OF MmoTioW Jo LECoASINER AME OIX BR! MOTION TO APPELLATE Cont To RECO SINE? DFAAL OF EAvE m AMEAL _ ARMENOIN Fi Motion “To DisTe(T CORT To CEcoMinee DEMAL OF 32255" PETITION __ Appewait_b$ MEmMot Anum iy SPORT OF 32755" QETTION __ _ AREMOIk Ht AFFIDAVIT OF TIMOTHY RYAN WITH 23 OSC 3/74 DECLARATIO AQPEN DIA 13 BUDENCE Iw SUpoaT of PETITION FrHuAT WEE IGNORED __ARDENDIX SS Regurral —To boveanment’s motiow To Dismiss $2 PETITION — AMP EwniX 3 32255 HABEAS Conus PeTiTIoy AMPENDIAL S Motions ~fo SWPLEMENT 2iuss bEtition AQPENOIY MA “TRIAL “ThAWSCQIPT WITH EYAMOLES OF PROSE UsTOMIAL miscoan 4 oe vi ; TAGLE OF AUTHneITIES CITED a —CAseS age pup 6) House Vv. BELL, 547 US, SB, 537 (L008) fi a STATUTES Aw RULES a 28 US.¢,. $2255" 5, bo, F Ub U.5-C B2USS RULE Y b) ed FEDEQAL RULE_OF Civil. Pholepupe 236) q Lb U.S.C, 2252, ee FEQOEQAL QUE OF Civil PRocepUnE 1s @) PY a Us CoveTiTtiod AMEWOMENR 6 US, ConstitUtiow AmenOMeEvt !4 ie _ a ee a a a SURLEME Cova _OF “THE (waren STATES PET rTIOMER QESPECTFULLY Paays THAT A WUT OF CEZTIR AL) ISSUE TO REVIEW THE “Suh e meat Béla, a 9 227,011 27,12 (2 Dis | THE Opimion! OF THE UMTED STATES COUR DL ARPEA AA A PPEMON. THE PET w_AmO_ iS RE foRTER A RAS EA GQ THE op wion_OF THE UME STATES DISTRICT CAT AT A TRS THE PETITION AMD 1S REPORTED AT _ SDs LEXIS JOUR es eT “JUL TION a TS ATE Ons WHICH “THE UWITEO STATES CoMT OF ee A TIMELY FILEO PEtitION FoR REKEAQIUIe WAS ——_DEME) GY “THE UwrEp states CART AE AMEALS Ov _ “Suv& 24,207! An) A Copy OF THE ogpe@ a a a a a I I I a a a a I I ee a a ee a I TT a RR TT I I a I a ee ee ee CowsTITUTIONAL Awp STATUTORY PRovisions IWVOLVE 2 | US, Const ITUTLON AMENDMENT &! Apox. & P. 1,56 = U.S. CONSTITUTION AMEWOME WT b> Appy.c 2 1.2, b5 APPLY PZ US. Constr T1ON AMEMIMENT AMER Ib US. CONSTITVTION AQTLE | SECTION % CLAUSE 33 APPT 24 | TiTLe 1% 3 19bl § Apry. 3.23 “THLE 1% 3 2252’ Apex, BP THLE 1} $ 2006 | APY. RP , Apr PF me 188 47; AML S plo sae eine laws jams Pa Te 283 SIAM PS qr igi Anse FTE 2B 3.22531 AKA DL; APPLLO 2. ,

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2022)

Attorneys

Timothy Ryan
Tomthy Ryan — Petitioner
Tomthy Ryan — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent