No. 21-6791
Daryoush Javaheri v. U.S. Bank N.A., et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure capable-of-repetition civil-procedure constitutional-rights crawford-vs-us due-process judicial-review res-judicata spencer-v-kemna spencer-vs-kemna standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-06-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower courts fail to apply the 'capable of repetition yet evading review' doctrine?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the lower courts fail to apply the “capable of repetition yet evading review.” doctrine in the instant matter, as expressed in Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 17 (1998)), thereby infringing the due process rights of the Plaintiff and warranting reversal on appeal? ii
Docket Entries
2022-06-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-04-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-09
Brief of respondents U.S. Bank, N.A., et al. in opposition filed.
2021-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2022)
2021-11-29
Application (21A183) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 27, 2021.
2021-11-22
Application (21A183) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2021 to December 25, 2021, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
U.S. Bank, et al.
Ofunne Nkechi Edoziem — Perkins Coie LLP, Respondent
Ofunne Nkechi Edoziem — Perkins Coie LLP, Respondent