No. 21-6801
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection evidentiary-hearing extrinsic-fraud fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-fair-trial
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying a second or successive petition on the petitioner's claims of due-process, equal-protection, ineffective-assistance-of-counsel, prosecutorial-misconduct, extrinsic-fraud, right-to-fair-trial, right-to-fair-appeal, procedural-due-process, evidentiary-hearing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2021-12-21
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2022)
Attorneys
In Re Johnny McMahon
Johnny E. McMahon — Petitioner