Is it fraud practice upon the Court when an Assistant State Attorney misrepresents the facts of a Petitioner's Motion in their Response to a show cause order by the Court?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is it fraud practice upon the Court when an Assistant State Attorney misrepresents the facts of a Petitioner's Motion in their Response to a show cause order by the Court? 2. Is it a manifest injustice, miscarriage of justice, constitutional error and fundamental error for a State Circuit Judge to allow an attorney to change his client's plea of Not Guilty (denying all allegations), to a affirmative defense? 3. Is it a manifest injustice, miscarriage of justice, constitutional error and fundamental error for a State Circuit Judge to allow an attorney to admit his client's guilt to the jury, without stopping the trial to ask the client, does he agree to this line of defense, in a non-capital case, where the attorney is not making a plea for his life? 4. Is it a manifest injustice, miscarriage of justice, constitutional error and fundamental error for a State Circuit Judge in Florida to adopt the State's response to a Show Cause Order, the Judge gave, deeming all grounds were legally sufficient, when in fact, the State's response basically states the entire Motion is insufficient, yet the adoption was done in contrast to the Judge's prior order to show cause and without adhering to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(F)(2), (3), and (6)? ii yy)