Should Armin Wand,III's September 9,2012 statement have been suppressed?

No question identified. : t * 1. SHOULD ARMIN WAND,III S SEPTEMBER 9,2012 STATEMENT HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED? : 2. DOES THE COERCED . UNRELIABLE CONFESSION PROVIDE _ A MANIFEST INJUSTICE FOR WITHDRAWING ARMIN WAND,III S PLEAS? . 3. SHOULD A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY HAVE BEEN ISSUED ON ALL ISSUES? 4. DOES NEWLY DOSCOVERED EVIDENCE PROVIDE A GOOD . FAITH SHOWING TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS TO INVESTIGATE,AND TO RAISE THE NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE IN STATE COURT? RISE OF PARTIES ; . All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. RELATED CASES . Wand .V. Boughton, 18-CV520,U.S. Distict Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Judgment entered Aug. 11,2020. ; Wand V. Boughton,NO. 20-2767,U.S. Court of Appeals for the ae Seventh Circuit. Judgment entered May 15,2021. , Wand V. Boughton, 20-2767,U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. Judgment entered Apr. 16,2021. i . \ . a . OPINIIOlIS BELOW < | = JURISDICTION Yih CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED: : 4 . —,