No. 21-6814
Eleazar Flores-Mora v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law due-process immigration-court-jurisdiction immigration-jurisdiction niz-chavez-v-garland notice-to-appear pereira-v-sessions removal-proceedings statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the immigration court has jurisdiction to remove a noncitizen where the removal proceedings were initiated by a notice to appear (NTA) that did not include the time and date of the hearing?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the immigration court has jurisdiction to remove a noncitizen where the removal proceedings were initiated by a notice to appear (NTA) that did not include the time and date of the hearing? Whether a removal initiated by an undated NTA can support an illegal reentry conviction? i
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Eleazar Flores-Mora
Christine DeMaso — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christine DeMaso — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent