Did the District Court's ruling consistent with the holdings in Neil v. Biggers

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : | 1. Did the District Court’s ruling consistent with the holdings in Neil v. Biggers, 423 U.S. 98, 114, 53 L.Ed.2d 140, 97 S.Ct. 2243 (1977)? 2. If the Circuit Court's are only now determining . misidentification is one of the single greatest source of wrongful convictions in the United States why wouldn’t the District Courts take more precautions in their decision to look at the credibility of the State’s views to people on drugs more credibility especially, when they are actually trying to get out of confinement settings? 3. How .does State and Federal Courts assure wrongful convictions do not happen if they are relying so heavily on eyewitness identifications which conflict with one another? | PARTIES The petitioner is Daniel Locus a prisoner at New Jersey ; | State Prison, P.O. Box 861, Trenton, New Jersey. The Respondents | is the New Jersey Attorney General at Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, P.O. Box 112, Trenton, New Jersey, 08625. | ' 3 | | |