No. 21-6848
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure equal-protection equal-protection-clause federal-major-crimes-act judicial-interpretation major-crimes-act mcgirt-v-oklahoma native-american-rights new-rule subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), announced a new rule of criminal procedure
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED OL Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), announced a new rule of criminal procedure. . ; ; 2. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ independent determination that McGirt announced a “new rule of criminal procedure” rest on an | “independent and adequate” state-law ground. — 3. . Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ determination that | subject matter jurisdiction claims which are grounded upon the Native American ethnic group and the Federal Major Crimes Act may be forfeited or waived violates the Equal ' Protection Clause. _ , os
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Juan Lopez
Juan Lopez — Petitioner