No. 21-6855
Devin Andrich v. Jerome Francis Meyers, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-discretion due-process judicial-procedure rebuttal-evidence time-limits trial-procedure trial-time-limits witness-examination
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in deciding that a 2-hour trial 'chess clock' did not violate Petitioner's due process rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the court of appeals erred when deciding that a 2-hour trial “chess clock” did not violate Petitioner’s due process rights, because Petitioner did show harm suffered by the time limits when the state court did not allow | Petitioner to complete examination of Respondent; did not allow Petitioner to testify in his own case; and did not allow Petitioner to call rebuttal witnesses to Respondent’s testimony. 2
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-04-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2022)