Whether the court erred in granting summary judgment to the officials on the ground that there was a genuine dispute of material fact concerning whether the officials used excessive force to cause harm?

Question presented is : 1.Whether the court erred in granting summary judgment to the officials on the ground that there was a genuine dispute of material fact concerning whether the officials used excessive force to cause harm? 2.Whether the court erred in ruling in favor of the movants instead of the non movant when the evidence is to be believed and drawn in the non movant favor. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202 (1986). 3.Genuine dispute of facts are those in which the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non movant. The plaintiff advised the court that prison officials hit him in the scalp, forehead with handcuffs and naked fist during a shower extraction. The video evidence clearly shows the plaintiff was bleeding badly from his scalp and forehead when the prison officials brought the plaintiff out of the shower. Surely, any reasonable jury would believe that prison official did harm the plaintiff, and his right tobe free of excessive force was clearly violated based on the video evidence in this case. Therefore, the order affirming the motion for summary judgment rendered September 21, 2021 should be quashed. ii