No. 21-6860
Lanny Jay Lyerla, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-law court-correction due-process harmless-error judicial-error manifest-injustice plain-error procedural-fairness witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When an action of the court causes a harmless error to become plain error, is there due process for the defendant to apply to the court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED () When an actron ol tee court causes a lenmless errer to fi come be J, plain eter, is trere due Process for te dePeidaAt to apply to tHe coset (3) Once plain ercoc exists, ows lone, iS aNowed by las Doc ih to be reviersed and comected. (> ‘Soes 2004 teble to (Line, start he dere a plain error _ dt 2xists 2 Especcally wren gicverded by [aa (Harmlens Error) Frog S Ieag Sor correcdigg? 5 : (4) when Can a court reise Lo do a lan aoc review & oe |
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Lanny Lyerla
Lanny Jay Lyerla Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent