Whether Booker's invalidation of the mandatory sentencing regime, and post-Booker neuroscience facts about the adolescent brain constitutes extraordinary and compelling reasons to reduce a pre-Booker mandatory life sentence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR REVIEW oa. Whether Booker's invalidation of the mandatory sentencing ; regime, and post-Booker neuroscience facts about the . adolescent brain constitutes extraordinary and compelling reasons to reduce a pre-Booker mandatory life sentence. 2. Whether lower courts failure to consider defendant's age from neuroscientific perspective in his Section 3582(c) (1) (A) _ motion, and failure to adequately consider other pertinent § ‘ 3553 (a) factors constitutes procedural error under Gall v: United States. . . : | ;