Richard R. Lawless v. Kat Mulder, et al.
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Can a State court deny access to a jury trial and court discovery through the inappropriate application on an AntiSLAPP statute?
Question Presented for Review | Plaintiff was denied access to a jury trial and court discovery violating his seventh amendment rights through the courts | inappropriate application of the D.C. Anti-SLAPP Statute. | Plaintiffs cases were dismissed with Prejudice under the D.C. | Anti-SLAPP Statute, State Appellate Court denied request to hear appeal, denying Plaintiff access to further discovery and access to any other State courts within the United States. | Small Claims Judge Bosier applied the DC AntiSLAPP ina $10,000 small claims case, review Judge Epstein declined to review decision and Judge Puig-Lugo cited the application of the DC Anti-SLAPP Statute in the small claims case as the primary reasons he was dismissing a $482,000,000 lawsuit with prejudice. (same Plaintiff) | “Can a State court deny access to a jury trial and court | discovery through the inappropriate application on an AntiSLAPP statute?”