Whether the Philadelphia Police Department's policy of denying concealed carry permits to law-abiding citizens violates the Second Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4 til hij DeliLinvter tS wt Priladel Prine da bnurd ahi y egarding Akcersed Phutsell uliich vig Shostlaeay 7 . 2. duconse J louasel Isler i aso la barrow but whe tod Wd Lud Mickel Like ail eter Caitteals 7 Sh tthy ib (hurl Hate 00\ Paiad Fach Wh ler Ar hutontheqes pos inners a i / f / } . { fs hn fow ii Loutoried lotfers (a) re pordig Meroasod thurgol 7! ; ; 4 UL ally ub Ahuvd fide (t's poral Luk dulen oh bir [ 4) Your lelders Led mn Siiprome Eoark of F loeiile allin r¢ bevcate oh deren eal lainsel 7 ' _ f So whi aleged faitdel ees sh Aedey rrenkoted Ly fob Hine, eels shou! nf (Hangs ad At Leaberl oun el like Foon 32 75 h_ wh priv Ly faut Atle 4 /95fdca] Aint friar Znain (gra ilirSalin.a uh Et eged Lous ia sof feaiah Lore hy mod tarel Ube Wh) acge ad dicen od Cainesof lise? ‘ “ny (ihe feb eicte weed Jp Lhd be beso [9\ a) 4s Moshay dyke // fel [| Uilerd dy hi Uerned Pliner Akoud Attn sed lanthel / . / q bes 7 , Bp Pao 5 i fp 4 why fleleteosi hae bs Vredtul Mary 4 lotion And adlop Led Hal Counsel Wn a5 Sgrtedd by de tires Lovie! Cato 7 I tly Us fink nahi atenei loge Pbbibuse Die Newee ss eb best ty ipdgeyr MLO AE Lh Es / } ‘i TA 7 i, tl ! : ard j