No. 21-6871
IFP
Tags: collateral-review criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance McCoy-retroactivity mccoy-v-louisiana montgomery-v-louisiana retroactivity right-to-counsel substantive-rule
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct 1500 (2018), adopts a new substantive rule that applies retroactively to cases on collateral review?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct 1500 (2018), adopts a new substantive rule that applies retroactively to cases on collateral review? II. Whether McCoy is implicated where a defense attorney admits the defendant’s guilt pursuant to an affirmative defense theory, but then urges the jury to find the defendant guilty rather than not guilty under the affirmative defense, in direct contravention of the express agreement between counsel and the defendant to pursue an acquittal under the affirmative defense theory? ii INTERESTED PARTIES There are no interested
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Alan Price
Alan J. Price — Petitioner