Whether the governments need to secure court appearance outweigh the security of person from severe harms, mental and physical, due process and punishment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) DO THE GOvERNMTS NEED.10 SECURE COURT APPEKRANCE OUT WEG WWE “GECuRIIY OF PERSON FROM, SEVER WINES, MEN TANY PRYSICA\Y, DEATH DUE PROCESS AND PUNISUMENT. 3) PIITONER WAS PROVIDED ANFEFECTIV.COUNSE) .AND.EROMIBUTED FROM PERTICIPATING IN FAS owN DEFFENCSE, DID VIOIATE AME SIVTA AMEND MONT EQUALPROTEECTON ANDOUS PROCESS 2) THE 2G AT_INVOIVED 16 aE MAIN CAUSL OF ACTION, AND TO \MPORTANT 12 RE DENIED REVIeW oR POSTPONED, FOR THE C\NIN\ Will BE IRREEPRARIY Lacy N) PEDTIONE INMYCIMENT ~ PERSON NOT To fossces!” 1S A LEGISLANSWE —OVERQRE ATH citing APRIOR CONVICTION AG _AN EIEMENT AE ANEW QEEENSE WIQUING THE FET . P SOPAQOY PROTECIION ©) BEUNONER ADCIMENT fo1/f:2, £3 Ml ASPUED eMENARE_TNE . ", ie N ¢) PETITIGNER iN DICTME NT iS 4 CANSCIOASAY SOOKE ING Rw PR AL FES, Vial fei LE_EQURTEENTHAN THE PROSECUTION OF JS IN TT SELE DECLARING | CREATING. ANOTHER CASS OF CLIIZEN, “AGAMCTED EBON