No. 21-6879

In Re Allen Fitzgerald Calton

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-01-18
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: cause-and-prejudice constitutional-rights criminal-procedure evidence-review evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus innocence innocence-claim life-sentence original-jurisdiction state-court-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether transfer to the Supreme Court for hearing pursuant to the court's original habeas jurisdiction is warranted in this exceptional life sentence case where the petitioner has made a substantial case of innocence, and no state or federal court has held an evidentiary hearing to examine the new evidence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ar 1 , | | . . | Ma The. Sugceme Cousk OL Khe Unheds Grakes | Ma ce AWen" &" Calhon ‘ | Omairous Reon Under Seckoni (6S\ For Agallate i , F Cisewik US, Como OF Aggeals Oerial Of Leave Te Gle A Guecesshye wri * | | | Alen” F* Ca than * 11.222%R0 Connally Unit $49 FM G32 , Kenedy 1» Texes 28 (19 * ? | i Like Sernrence Case | pean Ce Qrueshans Reeserred ANWen “F" Caton [Wereather ceferced to ag Calton | haloeas Pelton Ereserks excedhonal Checumsranws Since Cartons convickon &o¢ adSenpred Musser, Nerd sulostartial evidence 6£ Cathons Wnacenca Was Ween Astouged. IA gohoulor a’ Bukchor vai Ce! WW Laas Ade inskumertalily o€ Calkons SeteOelose heey aX Yeia\. Cesare Whig sulodamtal new evidence of Ini Innocence. ' No courk nas ever Welk a \nearing AE assess His new evi dence hak esvallishes Cathong Annocenw. The Questions reseed are S \e Whethes Feonsler Ao Me Sickack Court Lor hearing gursus nt PON Combs ocainal \qaloeas yursdicion Vo rarcanked fa AHS excephional Life serene case where Wre oahoner Inas coed Sulosrontial case of innate. Nek ao Shaky Oc CedSaral Coury lnas WelB an eviderhary Wearing Xo etamine Wis new evidens? 2. wWherer ycanker Ayo he Sastack COUN Sor nearing, Qursuan AD Une cours octlatnd hdeas gus chin Wo worked inthe exceevronal Life Sedona cose wthere Ye eehhnan Can esteVeli Cause! and Qreyudica! foo Laling 4m coke The claim ear Vier Mek ao shake oc federal Cour has held an eordeioyy \n BoM, HW eramine his aww S@nduw oF ceslue the Cock issues? 3. When Srake Courks have adopted Mn Cedeal Mscrriage of Yusdice excegkion og a grrdre ag Xhair On | in cegsluhony Of & logeq ert shake ongelfcalions -Wher @ gekbioner eve (dashes a grime Lacie. Snowing OL [ANoCANL 1A ARR Vleck y Coutts Oo ane Aig ohanicg ane d CAMS eal Claims Ceniested on ane mertks nate Os Yaa Gedaral Gavoh accood dele — cence ons Mae ecesumpien of Cocreteness 4 those fin dinag MOSS WI MNe Shek? Courk undan -Weic Coums ere sent avd AEDPA?, Reliknn Cor Werk Of Wabeay Car yus page \ | | —this pelion shems from 4 \aloeas Caorgus emuring | Ya ulnch peliioner , Allen“ €™ Calton Fikreatler celerre to as Cavan ;, Wos Me mover \oekece Vre United Shakes Court of Aregealy Sor Me Hin Ciruitk . Callen 1S a poison sek) to Lyfe and in he custody Of Baby Cumpln the Ofector | DE MWre-rvexas Oegorkm ek Of Coiminal Washic® « | List O£ AX Rrocee dags Kr srate and Feleral Coumts C\) Couch. “Texas Cours af Caiminal Ageeals Aeakure of Rroceeding? Pelion For werk OL Wolsers Corpus Oocvek Numbers ©3,590-22 Capon 2 Ex Parke Allen"e% Calbon Wudgmene Cate T T-12-1N CaN CoucrS U.S. Soptene Court Ay ofeure Of Proceeding Pekeenr Tot Cook Of Corhorary Docvek Numb& 2 No, 20~5125 Cogkon % Xn ce Allen“k* Calton Wadgment Sake 10-5-20 (CB) Courks Uns. Courk Of Aepeadls FE) Circuth | NAlekure Of Proceeding, 2 Original Petition For writ of Hobees | Coreusg converked +o a moon For Leawte Te Ge Guccess he | Pekin Docket Number? Ajo. 2110245 Coplon 2 ace Allen “€% Catton | algrert Dales d-2b-2\ . | Pekan For ort O% Weber s Congus page \\ 7 | “Tokle of Contents woes Queskions cesented ° e 2 ° . eA Poses Wo The Qroceedings below 5 ° 2 pil Zisks oC All Proceedings TEN Skok ond Kelenl Courts e p“Valle of Conernks . oe ~ > pil —Tealsle_ Ot Avudrombies ° ~ » * * Ps» NA Oginwens Qelory . . el | Stelement BE WuisWeakon swe | | Relevark Consilulimal and Sretutory RrvisiwNS 6 eA Skoalenek Of EFacks . ° > eo + 292 CA) Facks € srabiiching, The meadaralily OC The’ Quichekmle’ Te The debe. Q.2 C®) Facks Suggeshas, The Sarertional Supression Of The ' Quddher Vaile! eS CY Facks ESalkisving, Ove Cigencd. Anas Exhibited WS Mscavem The Uaimep.2 CO) Arsitinal Facks On Webeas ond Facts Eshetlshed Arial. 9.10 “The Lodoatcle Tmeack O€ THe 'ButcharKne! Luh ThE ExQuure of The Fahse SShoxtheoe] and Sons The’ made Up Nakve Ugonthe Parcuadueness DEThe shakey case Ag A whole Apu 2th Thad Light pis Reasons For Granting The Wek « . ~ = BQ. Raa Foc Locks 0¢ WebeasCorqus page IV . —~valie Sf Caonkerd

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-16
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

In Re Allen F. Calton
Allen F. Calton — Petitioner
Allen F. Calton — Petitioner