Whether the U.S. District and U.S. Appeals Court erred in dismissing motions for appointment of counsel and amended complaints without serving defendants, granting leave to amend, and issuing subpoenas

No question identified. : e (Page | of 2) ee . a I FQuestion€S) Presented TE Pow dees both U.S. Districh land _1UAs. Appeals Couct motions _ _| forr_appaintment of Counsel get _|dismissed and_not be granfed___ _—_|purcsuant_te rule C28 U.S.C, & 915 OCD) of the Fedecal ___|Rules of Civil, Procedure. @ 12. How does — both _ | U.S. District and U.S. Appeals Court. erred by not _Seeving the olefendants. — 3. Hew dees this Amended Complaint not be granted pursuant _ THe Cred. Rc. Be IsCaX ys ee Which freely Qives the Court _|leave_-to_ Amend Pleadings When Justice So requires as a —__|matterc of law. How dees both U-S. District __ and__U. S. Appeals Court. erreal by not Servin gSubpoenas__ — . | pucsuant to Fed. RECiv. B45) _ _|to. obtain_evidence towards _|Claims against defendants. __ _ |S. How does +his Amended Complaint get lismissed, for failure +o “State a Clamta). Oe ie and why wad plain | et _ giver opprrinanity te_atnend —— Comp. laintsCothec then al , retoliatiao Claim). 7.___How Can these Very Serious issues Stated throughout not. be ___.__|undec ConsideratioA_as a. ___limportance to the _public_of the _ _lissue. Tt 1s avery Secious public —@—lesue—to_allow Full blown Criminals. run the /Rennsylvania