1. How does both U.S. District and U.S. Appeals Court motions for appointment of Counsel get dismissed and not be granted pursuant to rule C28 U.S.C. & 915 OCD) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. How does both U.S. District and U.S. Appeals Court erred by not Serving the defendants.

3. How does this Amended Complaint not be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P15 (Civ. P15 (C)) which freely gives the Court leave to Amend Pleadings When Justice So requires as a matter of law.

4. How does both U.S. District and U.S. Appeals Court erred by not Serving Subpoenas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P45) to obtain evidence towards Claims against defendants.

5. How does this Amended Complaint get dismissed, for failure to State a Claim(a), and why was plaintiff given opportunity to amend Complaints(other then all retaliation Claim).

6. How Can these Very Serious issues Stated throughout amended Complaint(s) not be under Consideration as a importance to the public of the issue. It is a very Serious public issue to allow Full blown Criminals run the Pennsylvania

Whether the U.S. District and U.S. Appeals Court erred in dismissing motions for appointment of counsel and amended complaints without serving defendants, granting leave to amend, and issuing subpoenas