whether-alvarado's-conviction-qualifies-as-violent-crime

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . I, WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF’ THE COURT’S RULING IN BORDEN V. UNITED STATES, 593 US, ” (2021), ALVARADO’S CONVICTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. §111¢(a) AND j(d) QUALIFIES AS A VIGLENT CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C, §G24(c)? i Il, WHETHER THE TRIAL “COURT'S SUA SPONTE ASSERTION OF THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF "INEVITABLE DISCOVERY” VIOLATES THIS COURT’S PRONOUNCEMENT IN GREENLAW V. UNITED STATES, 554 U.S. 237, 24-244, 128 S.CT. 2559, 171 L.ED. 2D 399 (2008)? Ill. WHETHER. THE USE OF A RUSE, IN ORDER TO OBTAIN CONSENT TO SEARCH A HOME, UNDER THE : CIRCUMSTANCES AT BAR, VIOLATES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? IV, ! WHETHER IN LIGHT OF THE ISSUES IN THIS ! | CASE, JURISTS COULD DISAGREE WITH THE | | DISTRICT COURT’S RESOLUTION OF ALVARADO'S { CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS UNDER SLACK V. | MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), AND ~ \ MILLER-EL V. COCKRELL, 537 U.S, 322, 336 , (2003), AND COA SHOULD ISSUE? \ \ { \ \ .