No. 21-6899
John B. Alberts v. Grady Perry, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: automobile-exception container criminal-procedure fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel laptop-computer laptop-evidence private-property search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Trial Counsel was Ineffective for Failing to Move to Suppress Computer Evidence on the Ground that a Search Pursuant to the Automobile Exception does not Encompass a Laptop Computer as a 'Container' within a Vehicle Parked, and Unoccupied on the Owner's Private Residential Property
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Whether Trial Counsel was Ineffective for Failing to Move to Suppress Computer Evidence on the Ground that a Search Pursuant to the Automobile Exception does not Encompass a Laptop Computer as a “Container” within a Vehicle Parked, and Unoccupied on the Owner's Private Residential Property. | | ii ob, Yy
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-16
Waiver of right of respondent Grady Perry, Warden to respond filed.
2021-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Grady Perry, Warden
Zachary Lewis Barker — Office of the Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
John B. Alberts
John B. Alberts — Petitioner