Questions Presented for Court Review

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR COURT REVIEW | 1An Indictment whose “True Bill” is only signed by the US District Attorney to arrest and criminally prosecute an accused is valid, even when the signature or signatures of the AUSAs that normally act as “attorney for the government” is absent from said “True Bill” before the Grand Jury? 2Does Rule #7 (c) (1) of Federal Criminal Procedure require that every “attorney for the government” that participates before a Grand Jury be a | signatory.to the True Bill of the indictment produced, for it to be valid? } 3Can a federal judge or magistrate authorize an amendment and substitution of , an Indictment, when it is requested by an AUSA that did not participate in the ; supervision of the Grand Jury as “attorney for the government” in its determination of probable cause? | 4Did the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit commit an abuse of judicial | discretion in upholding the dismissal of the Mandamus requested by the | petitioner, when the Respondent did not submit a response to the Appellant’s } Brief and the Court refused to discuss and evaluate the absurd interpretation of the District Court on Rule #7 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which | said Court used to dismiss the Mandamus? wal IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JUAN M. CRUZADO LAUREANO NO: | Petitioner-Pro-Se meee n enn n nnn n nn nnw nnn nne eee nnn n On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Vs. First Circuit -Case #20-1590 W. STEPHEN MULDROW U.S. District Attorney of PR Respondent