Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. WHETHER Tiere Ewsr A SUPP oCEEWT Factuat BASIS To ESTABLISH PETITIOvVEeS PlER oF Gurl TY PubSurnT TO Count . . One , Which Changed f VioLahow of TIME ZI UuS& 5 84) Ca) (2), (b)C1)(A) pid 846 oo . — B. Wietiee THe Court oF AppentS FoR The SEVENTH CzecuT | BRRED Whey ET DereemineD THAT comnsel FR THe PET INER RAightiy Coniclupeo motion To WITHDeAW fis flex wosd _ BE Feivelous whew THE ApPELLANT 8 Fme and Just Reasa To wititpesaw hs Plax is say HE EX Micithy DPS avowEo THE Fracture Brsis Pe THE Guilty Puen ? : oe LISTOFPARTES = ss oe . [x] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. . Le yan parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of an . >. all