Joseph Earl Clark, II v. Shawn Lindsey Britt, et al.
Securities Immigration
Whether the petitioner's civil rights were violated by state prison officials
No question identified. : | | jae Qu] ON PRE \ p \ \ Af Net neg Ne 0 ry Cy Qed an 2 t ( ‘ { i t j 0 OW al + Oi S CTi0N A MAN UnmMa Udamen ' ty t AOGOAW pe Ones i t \ Petitioner filed o ccv'l achon unde 2 USC, Seehbon 199 ‘ | ( ‘ ‘ 4 ett e Din CCP iVog ) 7) 9 an es C0 Uroe Ne SIO Li tutven ‘ t by State pcifon ofFicta Lic in the United states D ‘c+ Court for the V ? Mm Sle Di { Of North Cara lina ee ( Docket en ‘, # 9 anc the { \ \ f tft } Complain ough Ks 0m_a 4, hat occurred in tedation+to ¢€fimina f 4 {| \ Proceedin NAT w/e arer Cd br he ort Ca a eneral Court { . cae t Q é a. Superio ovr t Divisio o otland County. the Conylag 4 tf ‘ Guid Not Seek’ fe 23 fYaan_An pr ifor y pling Proceeds See Td. Respandect: ‘ 4 ( ( (oA ' led a matin O a mI1SS_ cla Mia mo rs) ¢ ation Wwese Seel ni e 123 AMM Vad ' ( Fo pcSon (2 (a) oceeding which balled the ol late tage t : d bo a Previous habe ofp eciran, see Cdocket entry #57, and 4 ‘ { taf 4 itboner : fe CO9n Q brarn' iA} Ac yn uj NG? iO (2 Noy yn, bo dus (All Aa t ‘ t _ p(oceedings, bot fram Climinal ploceedias e (Docket Ent *62).. ( [ \ , : 1a CO dicen! Mims sq the Com plaid nde ollaTeral €Stopee| i ( ' ‘ ( : OY APP Vina am A Tae Oma ad 0 TA ONG/D elits No rate Fa omplalt ? age A of FT ee PART ILE 0 THE PRo DING. » 11! t ‘ {7! Q Oner 18 osep “a Clark appellant Ploutih ( dD dD j | ROS Ponder AY@ Pear. Lach ecu Shawn. 8 Ki opie. Ames Or Lockleg ‘ ( 6 { e On Ad ean Amit. Homan dna Queen evald, Ronald Co A9Tor) t ( fi . lizabeth Wollace, Reginald ewoon, Sciana Barter appalleesdefendan ( ( ( Res po de ts Stin Cha AVG Toya oll: g CNA: Vw Mi not ( ¢ ¢ ( \ O( Ved d : OU: AN did no p a vay: 2 tn _ apfen Dor, ( Fs : 4! Respondent Monica Rose AlmadveoVa Geen dasT } u/as_ he nd 2fa ay! xx ABLE OF Co h ABLE OF Authe @ . . ut ( T PatTiTi0n SIeS not e eed five. Pages and horetere does no Med authactt: : NOaVve oO Opie OF ONTUATS oO Qs Able ATA Or é € ATION To THE OPINION AND D NT IN Courts BELOW i \ i od he. de On Of th MTed State ° OF Appeals for the Fourth Circ ‘ 4 ‘ \ ul ( i (¢ preported, and s eproduced in this peripo O