Whether a criminal defendant can make any findings in any state court regarding the criteria for conviction while represented by appointed counsel, further, as an appellate counsel fails to preserve for federal review a claim of a criminal defendant that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED KW Ea Fic ode e Colon nel deen dart Wao a Erosk =RO eh as K Trekterd os CTQNS ond La Ye APQST AKO RAL & vaucsel Far smd TPO eal, Unde Fhacihea cage low & wriormal deSendeank’ can nck MAUS any Qeadngs NO any Skok Ceuc’ Feqardtng Wye ererias\ canvisk an while Teeresenved ‘ay Spparorved jac s eketned, eaunsel, Fucker, Ss an sapellake caunsel Sails ke ere secve Sac Fedecal TRWR AL, wc” Federal ze a clednn a cetrorinal defendont Wwe, Re keke GCELCS UPR ae 4 THE adhe ba cernedy MAR SJeor\use ba Febeoakce Ane cleson, ses cars> : = Qawioarek apoe\\ ake Reunscel’S Scluc ers Federakize @ Weian iA aSicss BPACHL ASL & prckkes CF SENNG cantik eance”™ Sac c deSaulk hen Mane deKeadany dacs aak \vene amy Skok cack decade eue lable Kea Ceune dy Nae KE cAWS? Yas Fedecelice Se cderon 2 WM XN Ss eH OES Gece PTSESReubor WS NG Sq AeSemdens ~ rac ATEN Ss je Tea sek Levek. \keee, ac Erasesckac Seared Gud AS Aasins TT SAACH ROS Raek ~ Wave any Vesey you Sen gassky BAQue’s NANG , NOK yo Sselveve Myak AC iy a Kee cade tee Kec.’ Naes colin g Q estmmeradh dees chart og het ta class as BEAR HL AK ea ntti kuke < HES PRE BPE PNNE AL Nae 167 SPN Oy me Cam meas aa We evidence.” ?