Whether the Supreme Court should resolve a circuit split concerning the standard of review for a constitutional speedy-trial-claim

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Supreme Court should resolve a circuit split concerning the standard of review for a constitutional speedy trial claim. 2. Whether the second and third factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 14 (1972), were correctly evaluated under either the (appropriate) de novo standard of review, or under the (applied) abuse of discretion standard. 3. Whether an unduly lengthy trial—consisting of 128-days spanning 18 months— violates the Due Process Clause. i