No. 21-6935

Richard Roy Blake v. City of Northglenn, Colorado

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2022-01-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-assembly free-speech municipal-code vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the City of Northglenn, Colorado police department violate Petitioner's First Amendment rights to free-speech, free-assembly on January 4, 2020 when they issued him a ticket and threatened him with arrest while he was engaged in a peaceful protest on the sidewalk adjacent to the Metropolitan Denver North Islamic Center?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Did the City of Northglenn, Colorado police department violate Petitioner’s First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly on January 4, 2020 when they issued him a ticket and threatened him with arrest while he was engaged in a peaceful protest on the sidewalk adjacent to the Metropolitan Denver North Islamic Center? 2.) Did the City of Northglenn repeatedly violate Petitioner’s 14» Amendment rights to due process and equal protection in prosecuting him under Northglenn ordinance 9-11, 16.5, arguing that instead of being an American citizen with Constitutional rights, he was, in fact an object, obstructing a city thoroughfare. 3.) Is Northglenn Municipal Code 9-11,16.5 void for vagueness under 14th Amendment and overbroad under the First Amendment? 4.) Did the Adams District Court The Adams District err in affirming Petitioner’s conviction on minor procedural grounds in an otherwise compliant appeal in violation of Section 1 of the 14» Amendment per Bodie v. Connecticut 401 U.S. 371 (1971) and not giving Petitioner any notice of alleged deficiencies and an opportunity to amend his appeal? i

Docket Entries

2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Richard Roy Blake
Richard Roy Blake — Petitioner
Richard Roy Blake — Petitioner