Does the Fla. court's imposition of an all-inclusive, total pro se filing bar violate the Suspension Clause of U.S. Const., Art. I, sec. 9?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the. Fla. courts imposition oF on allinclusive, total pre se Filing hac violate the * Suspension Clause oF U.S. Const. , ost T, sec.43 2. Dees the U.S. Const, J+4 Amend. copuive a litigant is.given a plenacy appeal| Ot & coucts imposition 6 an all-inclusive pro se fi ling bare ¢ 3, Where a Flo. court has never deemed any ofa litigants pleadings he Filed therein to howe been Frivolous, malicious or repetitive ; would that court's imposition af on all-inclusive, Total pro se Filing bar on that litigant be impermissibly ovechroad in violation of U.S. Const IS [4% Anendnents 7