Whether the Sham Commercial Lease Exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine applies to the facts of this case

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A© SHAM Cin € feat war ULE Fon be CE ba ments y C Killany N.l. trnde 7% ltekene pv fae WEws lew find UALS LSfé& Far fKe Lo amen iy/ the EC fase Tease (Feacar[Pmenecy ta Ce, Te ye fz NOY Darereserc AAG CLA (-< edger bee KLO tren he Mie. Ach — Se oyont Act-~ibernur ttc. sein AG), , ete, No we Skill Ne Za kis enipnts Sen Be Nirkaicd Clen fe Jon wm a r of’ PA ah ony Serd ru tra Edi mes tn Gracey ©The KGUse , Vrcs¢ oxgect , leary taacl Lotrncfpkeus Done Py Ft Pale Taka 72 set-upa Hany La ure Lote ll th fog “AcANe Break Qveslixs AL Die Te Aw Fale chee whic lt tetaly to (6) ELV44S Sheeg