Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals abused its discretion and violated due-process, civil-procedure, pro-se

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals abused its ‘ discretion and violated Mr. Vorasiangsuk's due process right when it misconstrued the second ground of his Motion for Rehearing as a Motion to Supplement as well as a Motion to exceed the 15 Pages Limit per FRAP Rule, and then denied it without reviewing the , factual contents or allowed Mr. Vorasiangsuk, a Pro Se prisoner, the opportunity to correct the formatting deficiency. Whether the Appellate Court erred and violated Mr. Vorasiangsuk's due process right when it failed to address and denied his Motion for an Extension of Time, Motion for Reinstatement, and Amended Motion for Rehearing despite the fact that these motions were all timely filed under the Prison Mailbox : ‘Rule. Whether the Appellate Court erred and performed at an unreasonable standard when it affirmed the District Court's | decision despite the evidence of clear and obvious errors as pointed out in Mr. Vorasiangsuk's Motion for Rehearing. | Fe (ii)