Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the petitioner abandoned, through failure to brief, a separate claim that he is subject to an illegal seizure

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \Nhet her Hie Court of Appeals erred ‘in Holding Mat Leh henel wbandered , tyrovgh feature do bref, 2 Separmte Claim that he s Gubyect + an “Mega | acre SF Woe Jee whetwer the court of Appeals erred delendants violated bis Fifth Brendment right > 4d counsel and Stlence as tt fer the . Siest hme or appeal. 0 | |