Whether the state supreme court erroneously departed from the essential requirements of the law and denied petitioner's federal constitutional claim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; | Uhethor the Shute Sufeme Chuet eeroneouslY departed Feom the essenhnd Reduinements ofthe lKw And denied Relihiner’s Federal Constituional Claim. _ — fobihonen Resets the Fixst District Couet of hepeat Riled tp bike acimely decision on ‘the Mohn 4p Nreate, oid Tada ment onthe Amended Ticwal hie? Rurguank do Aa . RCV. Poe. L.MOGXSNb), for Which Creates a Manifede | Inductive: And violates febihonee’s tists againetthe U.S. Const. 5° 4 Ariendment anal Fla. Cond. Bebicle. 4 Sechon ae 4, Due, Peocess of Law. See APPendic AU at fa.u. | . . LISTOF PARTIES 7 [] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. | we All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of . all