No. 21-6968
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-protection criminal-procedure criminal-remand double-jeopardy due-process judicial-discretion north-carolina-v-pearce sentencing sentencing-enhancement twigg-v-state
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is the State of Maryland's case Twigg v. State, 447 Md. 1 (2016), afoul of the long standing principal set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), i.e. that an increase in a criminal defendant's sentence is illegal, on remand from an appellate court. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the State of Maryland's case Twigg v. State, 447 Md. 1 (2016) afoul of the long standing principal set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969)
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Jay Jones
Jay Anthony Jones — Petitioner
Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Respondent