No. 21-6968
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-protection criminal-procedure criminal-remand double-jeopardy due-process judicial-discretion north-carolina-v-pearce sentencing sentencing-enhancement twigg-v-state
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the State of Maryland's case Twigg v. State, 447 Md. 1 (2016) afoul of the long standing principal set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION (S) PRESENTED 1. Is the State of Maryland’s case Twigg v. State, 447 Md. 1 (2016, afoul of the long standing principal set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), i.e. that an increase in a criminal defendant's sentence is illegal, on remand from an appellate court. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969). 2
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2022)