Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in affirming the district court's denial of petitioner's motion for a new trial based on the government's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , ES jb un(awe Jone ‘ (Q) os Th \neprecttuca sistance oF Counted Whee apo O.5', Wenharyf Wear COANSR\ LesH\Y pr ke mw reason to Levigur tey\Prone hehe mentary LSSue aL NLT reas Ke Le Wark For & merterl eruaKnert ion €or Raivio ? TS We o aedeor ero FOC Per vvioner fo OXCHee OS eae te Ln ade Awe Proseomwr rest es pr Se Asks CAA WY eo Vower ng the Cory from BL Mp binty GEM CASE: RUAN INCE do os nine Geurntey Heavy, GOON EL PESO ET fyeve hae otis Von, ne Cort Shee ke ra $e WH THUR -Forr TAN Go ony, SAMY BS 46 fh Veer be SUV aL APRON Nar 01 eek) No NN er soo freer Seer ay Pender \weeu WAN SCAT were Sree On ecoven DON SoGkare From NK) Axs tk ve phorr rons Serer? MEN ae ae fen ear Me etek lin Howey mewtdayy ee Pury toa case ro & mn OnL-orpur goosenk 0& Ro WVIOhe SVE “ RAW est gt Shaded We de no~ Ader Whed Lesh Ig Mmerotrouy Une qoark Rersoned, AK tn Pow mother Krew by Reb Tomer Glow Wwe LIAS In Hie rete’ Leela Loe ah. G eM ne Co TN eseistenen a toec ape Ginerengve a Miicnce. dE CSU) Gre cane a . = 4 Ve marFerkWe, ASCE EAE FE TER RN at cone a gaye can POM one gh Ie emte nen dora toner yt CS OT TPL oir Petitioner he'bl 3s heme Athena Fatt cet make Peoria HBR 305 oonsen gar SSeS pomger FOM