Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause

No question identified. : — Lof etn Ab aie ee he ben aed Eahb cre bain =tgptation CLEFT EASE MAA Th AO og hel EERE oa) eG aastion iipbl of Meira stipe Lies FECL. 2 gy TTL hcl ipa, toh. ose he lsat 12 addeflld Y.tiyp ith. Bintan a cnt ey = ma | ADMIT Ze ee CELA 4 LECSC. 223561 The aby lob Pf eA ghhoale ttt Don ORL ne Saxe (2) he_ iar Ube CotetjEih. feaanctleE Yn LS ES tse 1d be Ecspepidtheahes — Theo Ma ag ae Mit ice | ; 3 of ba | BOLE CE ATPORJES yeni tei LY -/ Of Me Ci UPL ff a . : | UO PEEL OK LC KK AVL ——Tobalis Lid fy My a an ___ back Life fpo8 LISP IG 7 Sa0 opcog) hearrap her, ites EVM Mb pif Ota fp) ay Nifee eke fay lr 3A, lta Contain) YBa VS ie, op SEZ ola Hebe, AES lap lig) | Me Leyes ibnipar, GAZE fp Lbs Mp liizdag) _b Le A oe —— We el TE Slee ji fies Lip [ HAA [hy 72 (GE dmg), ltl fv Sthe ttn Lh oa LB teal "2 ffdta) | , , | Wien, 296 oath Darel thin dst precadton Lb hed a Wither fo hatpig en be elf Igy th Aton ip lay, Qed 0 atin op i SAP ALA. f WW Ae, KLE CY i by!) KM SGA ZA | | . . hele ALLEL Gig” Vi } g P : . A Ab tars Ate PAR “its 28 SVE “Ga Ve Tl. ——_ y Z 7 ee} Otel Aare orcad” fog 444 HY, COP fP ~ pMoatpityte (eo f 0 Tahonee/, My Shed, ad nade GUE. Guy pal We si3ftee a a MORAL C203 Cite athe ele Vag Pellag ah Ghee Oe Lf lt YG lee. Boon cer” nrrrated fatton, che the i (Ve 4 OUASE SCV NY CEA —_—— y . peg / 4 Lian Chm?” frel” Vine ME gle [ite “Cf PD FOLAEG AYER LUREEL OD. GURL. £7 C2 1 Sta pierre. Kiang A Kktirnan, (he Chet /cteee Kane tal enftphe Lab ang eval on Mee Sts ) . y VA in, Lperent Tol Gla | ° bifP oe ke he rk conve i e WEL ZL pitas hits fag tar pb. 7 _””— fp tthe bur bots. qi | >, bite Lith Fh Z és L-rned 2 th Kk el Cie SODLE on GIL, wae