Whether the victim's statements to police are admissible at trial on the grounds of unavailability

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; (I) Whether & yicdims uncen Fon belrflate meatS +o police ure admissible af drial on the growls a Df unadarladift A Forest urewhere. RO Cicn: vt co dencl dock the appeilant wsnen Fully caused fhe wtness un cumlag, sy anh the Presee~ a fon £afek £0 prortoow duc diligance to ab/acr her PANS wfrentartlon . . @® Whathercolfnet, wil fe duke. ny ye ed at the Acarnf Wes cuen otlowed under + ; Same sone S alove.2 Chain Ao comnaah oF FRR State menys uged-from other Apicey mortprerend aT tke heoniny. fF il efihencle refed srnat ths Aeaeiy | Wal unCon Fronted and ind ke Ferm of one invest Jae sofrs whet onother From ante Hake Suppes 4y Seid ty Aime (hearsy/svitap of Kewte/, | ) Whether of (5 do2 Rearing Was even Finely fen the feet that $his hey Tol¥ Ib ors wos trie| wh TAS Yon Avaring WeS heark the Shine Ff Hapeslert heh pa (Mor A un / Ae poepert rar this Ae ats 4 ne . westions Prctente ph Ok rhe Deten dont get proper Ke prec hhalan ° The Pieeney Cenlineel/ Se? clnaealesto fia & wW‘Hnesl ducf condinaaly fills fo even Josk far fir. Ud the sitlorney pre Form Aly duties fy cartel fe, (ing undinalf” Motions Phat were. jar A levnd/ Aaurmin The Qetendantt Che Penta. we Atforney patPorva As dufies Ay pot FL eK = a HNemorandum of fonts aak Muvfori hel Jo Shi kee piors that Defendant Ad g odkn wonton Ta unk 4 ave fo As Worms Lo t-/2. The. Atlorne te gtk Mabon Liven tAeugh if we Whuld / a | 4 ot Conte oF Tne! TH fen Ares Hath] reduce LASS season ce. Mobor fs attacked Appent y