No. 21-6984
Hamid Michael Hejazi v. Oregon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review civil-procedure court-procedure due-process fraud judgment judgment-standard legal-appealability motion-dismissal procedural-rules standing
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ‘) Was it justified for +he Oregon Supreme Court bo deny fewiews of the appellate Commissumer's deciSiom +o dismiss Petitioner's appeal-— om the basis of the cirouit Court's oder of denial and dismissal of Petitioner's motion for relief Lama judgement for fraud vem the Court (Per ORCP 41) not being appeal alole ? 2) Shoud a denial and dismissal of a mohon foc reliek From o judgement Fer Froud upon the Court be deemed +o be appeatalole — So to be avle to howe errors by +he lower Court in said proceed in o. be Ceviewed 2 ¥ ond determination: Page 2 of Hejaz\ N. Oregon
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2021-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Hamid Michael Hejazi — Petitioner
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent