Is it fair, just, sound, and prudent that the denial and dismissal of a motion for relief from a judgment for fraud upon the court be considered to be unappealable when the order(s) open a contempt judgment on the basis that a contempt judgment must be appealed within 30 days of entry, and the motion for relief was and is brought on new evidence of the fraud upon the court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Dis it Fait, just, sound, and prudent that the Ci) denial and dismisgat of a mohan foc relief Krom a Judgement far fraud ups the cout? be Considered to be wanpeatable uhtn He arderrs) Oe pen a Contempt jadgement — on the bans jnat a cantemp> judgement must be apocated within 30 days of enky—ard the mohan fer (ehief was and mou be baught mee eyidence pf the fraud pen the cout ts rund? 2) May counset be cefused Cor a petone petihan or reviero When Counsel Is Granted by virhiwe of We guven Class ef case vp appralComm? 3) Shouid a tefusal to grant netief foc fraud pM the Court, une the tehisal comes by way oP Several kinds 0 Constitvhenal level impropyiety apier the Nial Cont, le allowed 1o he subject to oe . Lane mer ay Petihener ? Vage 2 of I ,