Whether the petitioner's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence under the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. Vule 10d, Testimony by Expats Witnesses: My \arogel re Tene Be a paly graph “Side of Cads Count Neal. with a Tofu Pedic, OF Ficer, (yur aaendeurt) im CT". a Lunino) 4 ox DNA wag newer Cound on me or a 3, Rule II, Factual Basis wes Mo Seeerbic Sackual ~ he 1 : : a \ N Ase ae mised 8 a (skate US: we Pecan ws ete) 4. EMegal Serhence. E've Seat fo Oe Se t vs frown 1S yeols “Special Dargeious OF Fenduc. OM} Felony on ony CeCe SY np fee “Motijvane Pessessinn, (Fe ch ve ye thet a state Court 5 . ack.son Vs, Uicginia — exharcrion coqeerner | iP a Court nus Consider Conu\crion cCeSrs ARON insufficient CUIdNe | if wa tr of +he Facts “steel there is suffigentr evidence VO syesty a Tax | Finding guilt heyond a ceasonade doust, a Coe deketmimation of ©. The lo Rinendoarte States Were entcithid to AY thie | may Fact on nin Ye legichertwre Conk eats) Zn oy mainutr furihmnsct, (1B floy manslaughter = B Mer tet POSt conviekions , shown Pwy gave Me OS QCooF af Sarrteace. © Nene, TT, nagrropciate Sacks from the Prasecurror ond Nudge on my Sentencing, B. TX also asteb in writing to Whe Suplene Court fo Withdtaus my Pan, od Hy Promises were \braton before Senrencany Sage. Osborn v. Shillinges. i 2 ley me Know het EL reading mote ov better acquemenrrs ¢ Please ler me Kno this Couwt me Specifically obherwise © finy other doturent I Serr oc have are ot Hu Coutts on the next page. Cast courts wes Eighth Caccuit oF Appeals. oo Thant You ,