No. 21-6992
Michael Rocky Lane v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review compassionate-release criminal-justice criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing ninth-circuit sentencing summary-affirmance
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-02-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the denial of Michael Lane's motion for compassionate release was an abuse of discretion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether The Denial Of Michael Lane’s Motion For Compassionate Release Was An Abuse Of Discretion? IL. Whether the Ninth Circuit's Summary Affirmance Was Improper? 1
Docket Entries
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael Lane
Florence M. Bruemmer — Law Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
Florence M. Bruemmer — Law Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent