No. 21-6993

Damon Willis v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment criminal-law due-process fifth-amendment firearm-possession firearms jury-instruction jury-instructions prohibited-status rehaif-v-united-states sixth-amendment sovereign-citizen
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-02-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Rehaif v. United States preclude a jury instruction that the federal government must prove a defendant knew his prohibited status made it illegal to possess a firearm when he claims a mistaken belief as to the application of 18 U.S.C. §§922(g) and 924(a)(2)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Police arrested Petitioner Damon Willis on three separate occasions for possessing a firearm after having incurred a conviction for an offense punishable by more than one year in prison contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Officers testified at trial that Mr. Willis adamantly stated, as a “Sovereign Citizen,” he could lawfully possess any gun he did not deface or take across state lines. The government used Mr. Willis’s mistaken belief that he could possess a firearm to satisfy its burden to prove that petitioner knowingly possessed the firearms in two of the charges for which he did not directly admit knowing physical possession. The trial court instructed the jury the government did not have to prove Mr. Willis knew the law prohibited him from having a gun, an instruction this Court subsequently declared improper in Rehaif v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), in the case of a man convicted as a non-citizen in possession of a firearm who claimed he did not know the student-visa he used to legally enter the United States had lapsed. Seven circuits have issued published decisions holding that Rehaif precludes judges from instructing juries that the government must prove a defendants knew membership in a category of persons listed in Section 922(g)(1) prohibited the possession of firearms. In light of the foregoing, the issues presented in this case are as follows: Does Rehaif v. United States preclude a jury instruction that the federal government must prove a defendant knew his prohibited status made it illegal to possess a firearm when he claims a mistaken belief as to the application of 18 U.S.C. §§922(g) and 924(a)(2)? Did the instruction in this case deny Mr. Willis’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to present a complete defense? 2

Docket Entries

2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
2021-11-17
Application (21A155) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until January 24, 2022.
2021-11-10
Application (21A155) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2021 to January 24, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Damon Willis
Charles Joseph BanksFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent